An extremely interesting phenomenon I witnessed over the last few weeks was the coordinated push by rich white old men to force predominantly poor young black men to work for them for well below their market value, so that the rich white men can improve the value of their product and hopefully capture more profit for themselves. While this sounds a lot like cotton plantations in the 1880s, I am talking about the seemingly coordinated efforts by the NBA and NCAA officials, making a push to raise the age limit for NBA entrance.

Now it’s obvious why all three parties who have decision-making/advocating authority in setting the age limit for entering the draft want players to stay in school for two or three years. The NCAA will get better players, which means a better product. They will also get the advantage of being able to market players over multiple years- take for example this year’s Kentucky team, which already has several of the most famous players in the NCAA as freshmen. The NBA will get additional ability to scout players and, perhaps more importantly, will get to save money as players’ year 19-21 seasons won’t have to be paid for. Even the NBA players union has a short-term interest in this rule: if Anthony Davis is forced to stay in school one more year, someone will take his roster spot. That will most likely be a current NBA player.

So this all makes sense from an economic perspective, sure. But the argument of “we want more money for ourselves, and we wish to take this from 19-20 year old predominantly poor, black man-children,” does not sound very politically correct, nor would it likely prove popular. Therefore, the NBA and NCAA have to trot out demonstrably false arguments to confuse the masses and win opinion to their side.

Argument one is that players who come into the league straight from high school are lacking in ability or maturity to adjust to playing in the NBA. This is like arguing the world is flat- you have to be willfully ignorant of hard data in order to make your argument. (Yea I’m talking to you Mark Cuban, who recently argued players needed to stay in school for three years and somehow managed to ignore the fact that his championship NBA team contained THREE rotation players that never played in college, DeShawn Stevenson, Tyson Chandler and of course, Dirk Nowitski.) Just in case you need any more evidence, look at the 2008 All NBA Teams, where four out of the 5 first teamers came straight from high school and over half the players did not go to college. And its not just superstars (you know, Kobe, LeBron, KG)- straight to NBA players follow a normal curve of outcomes, from All-Stars (Josh Smith, Monta Ellis, Andrew Bynum) to starters (Al Jefferson, Kendrick Perkins, Lou Williams) to role players (Kwame Brown, Dorrell Wright) to fringe players and washouts (Gerald Green, Robert Swift.) Clearly, players who don’t play in college are able to play in the NBA.

Argument two is that the league is somehow “doing the players wrong” by forcing them to accept the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars they are compensated for playing in the NBA. The argument goes that many of these players “wash out,” of the league quickly and are then left with nothing but that darn high school diploma, totally unprepared for the rest of life that awaits them.

This is at the least, a paternalistic argument and I would argue a racist one. The implied notion is that young black people with money are incapable of looking after themselves. Even if this is the case, the solution of the NBA and NCAA is not to set up support networks, or mandate financial planning, or ease regulations on NCAA eligibility, but to deny the players money in the first place.

And that’s why you know they’re being disingenuous. Because for most 19 years olds, the ability to earn the NBA minimum (over 450 thousand dollars) even for one year, will be more than a decade’s worth of income with a college degree. With that income, they also have the opportunity to attend college in the future of course, should they decide it’s in their best interests.

So please, NBA and NCAA officials, stop talking to us like we’re stupid. If you want to make more money by fucking over poor black teenagers, go for it. Just don’t pretend you’re being the good guys.

 

It has been three months since I was in Laos, so will I be able to remember everything I ate in that country correctly? Of course, because my stomach contains its own memory chip, able to provide instant recall of every meal it has ever eaten. For example November 7, 1988 I ate Same Old Place bacon and onion pizza for dinner. It was slightly better than normal because the bacon was extra crispy. Then I watched Sword and the Stone and went to bed somewhat hungry. This total recall of all meals allows me to judge the cuisine of Laos with perfect clarity and impartial judgment.

Like Laos itself, I found Laos food to be slightly underwhelming when compared to other cuisines despite the hype that had existed beforehand. That doesn’t mean it’s bad persay, as I was able to sample many excellent dishes, but you simply aren’t going to find the variety or quality of many of its neighboring countries.

Part of this may be an issue of imitation, as many Laos dishes blend into the cuisines of their more culturally influential neighbors, particularly Vietnam and Thailand. For example one of the cheap options for cuisine is a bowl of noodle soup, which runs around 10000 kip ($1.25). Whether it is lack of fresh ingredients or competition, Laotian Pho just does not compare the Vietnamese version or similar Chinese dishes such as Guilin rice noodles or Yunnan “over-the-bridge” noodles. The broth is weaker, the meat less hearty and most importantly, there are no interesting spices or flavors added to the cuisine.

Laos Rice Noodles

 

 

 

 

 

 

Similarly Laap, an excellent dish of minced meat, green onions, lime juice, cilantro and other spices, and the signature Laos dish, is basically replicated by the Thai. In fact I got some delicious Thai Larb Na at the Bangkok airport which was about as good as any laap I had (except for the aforementioned mushroom laap in Vientiane). When your neighbor’s airport food is crushing your signature dish, it might be time to admit you are in the minor leagues.

The Good: I shouldn’t be so hard on laap because it is delicious. I’m also a fan of the Laotian sticky rice, which encourages eating with your hands. A couple of other meals stood out in particular. The French influenced Laos sandwich which included pork, chili sauce and a variety of Laos veggies on a baguette made a surprisingly delicious breakfast or lunch. I also found myself repeatedly indulging in Laos BBQ, a sort of all you can eat buffet. Basically you take your meat and vegetables and cook them on a metallic BBQ tray over an open charcoal pit in the middle of the table. Ingeniously the tray has an elevated middle and sunken ring on the outside. The sink is filled with broth by a friendly Laotian server, providing a soup for you to cook your veggies/fish balls/whatever in while you fry the meat on the elevated middle. The results can be delicious, so much so that I ate this three times in five days.


The Meh: Ok I’ll be honest, the Laos BBQ wasn’t that good and there’s another reason I kept eating at the same place over and over again: the other options weren’t great. This could have been a unique problem to Luang Prabang, which was overrun with faux-Western restaurants and fusion cuisine catering to the insufferable amount of lesbian East Coast couples and British families that had invaded the former paradise for Christmas vacation (seriously who the fuck goes to Laos for Christmas.) But on my few ventures outside the tourist traps, I wasn’t exactly finding hidden local gems like you would in China or Malaysia. Meals did not seem to inspire the same level of passion and preparation. Maybe nobody eats out and home cooked meals are necessary to truly understand local cuisine. Or maybe, as I was informed by someone who had recently biked through Laos, they eat alot of rat on a stick.

The Ugly: The sheer amount of overpriced Western/fusion eateries in Luang Prabang. I cannot reiterate enough how disappointed I was with that place.

While ultimately Laos food has strong dishes, it can’t compete with its bigger and better neighbors. Even Cambodia food, which I rated well, probably would rank lower had I written it up later in my travel. Hey what can I say, I was feeling generous. Laos unfortunately, will not get the same love.

2.5 stomachs out of 5.

© 2012 Wandering Eater Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha